<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>New York Employment Lawyer Blog</title>
      <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/</link>
      <description>Published by The Ottinger Firm</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:56:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.33</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>The FLSA Motor Carrier Overtime Exemption and Local Delivery Drivers</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>We had an inquiry today from a commercial truck driver.  For two years, he made interstate deliveries to a single retail store that sold the goods.  The delivery required a 14-hour roundtrip that he made five days a week - for $220 dollars a day.  I nearly hit the floor. </p>

<p>It's not easy being a commercial driver, and the overtime laws don't help matters at all.  Basically, if you are a delivery driver and ship goods in interstate commerce, you are not entitled to <a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1180137.html">overtime</a>.  In fact, if you are distributing goods from a warehouse to outlets in the same state, but the goods themselves originated out of state, you are also not entitled to overtime.  </p>

<p>Based on my experience, there are only three situations where commercial drivers may be able to demonstrate an entitlement to overtime.  First, if your truck has a gross vehicle weight of less than 10,000 pounds, you will be eligible for overtime whether or not you haul goods in interstate commerce.  Second, if the goods you haul are manufactured and distributed in a single state, you will be eligible for overtime.  This is an uncommon occurrence, but not totally unforeseeable, especially in large states such as <a href="http://www.californiaemploymentlawadvocate.com/">California</a>.  Third, if you ship goods in intrastate commerce, regardless of the size of your haul, from an intermediate in-state storage point and distribute the goods to local retail outlets without a "fixed and persisting transportation intent" to deliver to identifiable retail outlets from the time of shipment, you will qualify for overtime.  In other words, if you deliver out-of-state goods from an in-state storage warehouse to a local retailer, you will qualify for overtime if no fixed destination existed from the out-of-state origin of the parts.  For example, if you are a parts runner for an automobile sales franchise that requests replacement parts and sends you to retrieve them from a local warehouse, you will qualify for <a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1180137.html">overtime</a> compensation even if the parts originated from out-of-state and they were not intended for any dealership in particular.</p>

<p>Whew.  </p>

<p>If you are a commercial driver and suspect you are getting the shaft, call for a free screening.  The law is still very unclear and employers will likely exploit the ambiguity.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/02/the_flsa_motor_carrier_overtim_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/02/the_flsa_motor_carrier_overtim_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:56:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Affairs in the Workplace and Sexual Harassment</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I frequently receive calls from potential clients who have been fired after reporting a supervisor's affair with a subordinate.  Is it illegal to fire an employee for reporting a supervisor's affair with a subordinate?  The short answer: probably not.  The <a href="http://eeoc.gov/policy/docs/sexualfavor.html">EEOC does not consider isolated incidents of "sexual favoritism" to be violations of Title VII</a>.  However, coerced sexual conduct by a supervisor may constitute quid pro quo <a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1180032.html">harassment</a>, and "widespread favortism" may give rise to a hostile work environment claim.  What is "widespread favoritism"?  Generally, it means more than one affair in the workplace resulting in greater opportunities for paramours.  The EEOC, and many state and federal courts, have determined that "widespread favoritism" communicates to all female employees that they can obtain job benefits only by acquiescing in sexual conduct.  I represented an employee who was fired for reporting his supervisor's affair.  In a complete coincidence, a year later, I was contacted by the paramour seeking to sue the same employee for defamation.  Workplace affairs are a nasty mess.  Nobody should be forced to work for someone who promotes paramours, but if you must, play the game long enough to find another job.  If you feel truly humiliated and degraded by a culture of affairs and meritless advancement, call a lawyer.  If you are having an affair with a subordinate, do yourself and your employees a favor - stop.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/02/affairs_in_the_workplace_and_s_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/02/affairs_in_the_workplace_and_s_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:02:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Friendly Skies and the FLSA</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>An interesting ruling out of the Third Circuit this past week clarified the boundaries of the FLSA's "learned professional" exemption in a decision involving the classification of pilots.  The opinion follows a <a href="http://wagehourlaw.foxrothschild.com/2009/03/articles/exemptions/ground-control-to-major-tom-dol-issues-opinion-on-exempt-status-of-pilots/">confusing non-opinion opinion issued by the U.S. Department of Labor</a> which articulated a "nonenforcement position" with respect to the exempt status of pilots.   The Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia in <em>Michael G. Pignataro; Thompson R. Chase vs. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey</em> affirmed a New Jersey federal judge’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of the pilots holding that they were not exempt employees under the professional exemption.  Since the pilots’ knowledge and skills were acquired through experience and supervised training as opposed to intellectual, academic instruction, they did not qualify as "learned professionals." According to the DOL, recognized "professional" occupations include law, medicine, theology, accounting, actuarial computation, engineering, architecture, teaching, pharmacy, various types of physical, chemical, and biological sciences.  A bit of intellectual hogwash?  Maybe.  But if you're a pilot and now <a href="http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20100128/NEWS/100129923">$87,000 richer</a> following reimbursement of unpaid <a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1180137.html">overtime</a>, it may not matter.  </p>

<p>And how are theologians paid, anyway?  When exactly is a theologian off the clock?  Sounds like a tough case for an employer.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/02/the_friendly_skies_and_the_fls.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/02/the_friendly_skies_and_the_fls.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:30:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Can my Boss Fire Me for Wearing a Yankee Hat?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you can be fired for wearing a Yankee hat, especially if your boss likes the Red Sox. </p>  <p>That is very unfair of course, but it is true.&#160;&#160; An <a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/">employee</a> can be fired for any reason or no reason – even for wearing a Yankee hat.&#160;&#160; There is no rule of fairness and cause is not needed.&#160;&#160; People call our law firm everyday with crazy stories like that.&#160;&#160; People seem to think that an employer needs cause to fire them.&#160;&#160; Cause is not needed.&#160; This is an “at-will” nation and you can lose your job for any reason or no reason.&#160;&#160; </p>  <p>I just got off the phone with a man who was fired for an arbitrary reason.&#160;&#160; It was unfair and he loved his job, but there was nothing illegal about his termination.&#160;&#160; </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/02/can_my_boss_fire_me_for_wearin.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/02/can_my_boss_fire_me_for_wearin.html</guid>
         <category>Employment Law</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:10:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Law on Accured Vacation Time</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I have screened plenty of calls from the <a href="http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/wrongful_termination/">recently terminated</a>, and by far the most common inquiry involves a separated employees’ right to accrued vacation pay.  My answer – it depends.  If your employer has a monthly vacation accrual policy, you are entitled to a prorated share of your annual entitlement based on the number of months worked prior to your termination.  However, many employers include disclaimers which nullify the benefit upon termination.  Look closely for these policies – if they are in your employment manual, you don’t get anything.  </p>

<p>This is not a matter of pocket change.  Some generous employers allow for rollover of vacation days, and employees can accumulate a substantial reserve of accrued vacation days.  I have a friend who made a down payment on an apartment with his accrued vacation cash out.  Don’t leave any money on the table.  Accrued vacation time should be the first benefit you seek in your severance payment negotiation, followed by any unpaid <a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1180137.html">overtime</a> wages.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/are_you_paid_for_your_accured.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/are_you_paid_for_your_accured.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Sexual Harassment And Professional Offices</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the 1978 movie "Animal House," before the credits role, the fate of the degenerate frat boys at the heart of the story is revealed in short clips. John "Bluto" Blutarsky, played by John Bulushi, becomes a U.S. Senator, and others become doctors and diplomats, the joke being that drunken depravity is not a liability in some supposedly respectable professions. </p>

<p>If you are an employee in a law firm or medical office, don't expect a civil work environment simply because you work among the well-educated. The Blutos of the world, often blessed with social privilege and elite schooling, take their depravity into adulthood. In fact, there are plenty of professional offices which become small social clubs, like fraternities, centering on the same rituals of drinking and debauchery. </p>

<p><a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1180032.html">Sexual harassment</a> involves the exploitation of power.  Doctors' and lawyers' offices are not immune to these abuses.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/sexual_harassment_and_professi_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/sexual_harassment_and_professi_1.html</guid>
         <category>Sexual Harassment</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:40:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Can I Waive My Right to Overtime Pay?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>One of the dirtiest tricks out there is the so called “overtime waiver.”&#160;&#160; Some sleaze bag companies have their employees sign an agreement giving up their right to be paid <a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1180137.html">overtime pay</a>.&#160;&#160; It looks legal and sounds legal.&#160;&#160; Hey, it is a contract so it must be valid – that is what everyone thinks.&#160; But don’t be fooled.&#160; That agreement is a sham – bogus – practically criminal. </p>  <p>The law is clear – an employee CANNOT waive his right to overtime pay.&#160;&#160; If your company had you sign one of these overtime waivers then you are probably working for a sleazy company.&#160;&#160; Ignore that waiver – burn it – it means nothing.&#160;&#160; You have the right to overtime.&#160;&#160; </p>  <p>Just so you know, we see these waivers all the time.&#160; Companies do it a lot – why – it works.&#160;&#160; Most employees get tricked into thinking that they do not have the right to overtime pay.&#160;&#160; Pretty slimy.&#160;&#160; Don’t fall for it.&#160; </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/can_i_waive_my_right_to_overti.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/can_i_waive_my_right_to_overti.html</guid>
         <category>Wage Violations</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:30:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Can My Employer Make Me Work Overtime?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, in New York your employer can require that you work <a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1180137.html">overtime</a>.&#160;&#160; In fact, your employer can even discipline you if you refuse to work overtime.&#160;&#160; The law only requires that you be paid time and half for each hour of overtime that you work, but you do have to work overtime if asked.&#160;&#160;&#160; You can refuse to work overtime, but then your employer is free to fire you.&#160; If your employer requires overtime from you, you either have to do it or risk being fired.&#160;&#160; If you don’t want to work overtime, your best bet is to find another job – one that will not require overtime.&#160;&#160; </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/can_my_employer_make_me_work_o.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/can_my_employer_make_me_work_o.html</guid>
         <category>Wage Violations</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:59:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Are Salaried Employees Entitled to Overtime?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, salaried employees are often entitled to <a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1180137.html">overtime</a>.&#160;&#160; People frequently assume that overtime pay is only for hourly employees, but this is wrong.&#160;&#160; Being paid a salary is not a factor – what matters most is the kind of work you do.&#160; </p>  <p>A salaried employee, like an hourly employee,&#160; must be paid overtime unless they meet the test for exempt status as defined by federal and New York state laws.&#160;&#160; So – the easy answer to this common question is that being paid a salary is not a factor.&#160;&#160; Do not assume that you are not entitled to overtime pay just because you are paid a salary.&#160;&#160; You may be entitled to overtime pay.&#160; </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/are_salaried_employees_entitle.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/are_salaried_employees_entitle.html</guid>
         <category>Wage Violations</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:13:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Diabetes and the Americans with Disabilities Act</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Another day, another new <a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1180055.html">disability discrimination </a>case involving a plaintiff with diabetes.  In my practice, I have screened a number of cases involving legitimate claims of diabetes-related disability discrimination, more than any other protected disabling condition.  As it turns out, there is a long history of intolerance towards employees with diabetes.  For many years, a diagnosis of diabetes automatically disqualified many otherwise qualified applicants from certain categories of employment, including firefighting and police work.  While these early prohibitions have since been declared illegal, many diabetic plaintiffs still face an uphill battle in court.  </p>

<p>What's the problem, anyway?  Well, before the <a href="http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/adaaa_notice.cfm">2009 Amendments to the Americans with Disabilities Act</a>, diabetics often slipped through gaps in the law that left them unprotected (i.e. diabetics were not considered disabled because they could entirely mitigate symptoms with medication).  However, with the changes to the ADA, employers must now accomodate disabled employees regardless of the impact of mitigation measures (medication) on an employee's disabling condition.  </p>

<p>Employers don't like accommodating diabetes in the workplace.  I had a case where an employer told a diabetic employee that her diabetes was the result of her own poor lifestyle choices and refused to accommodate her.  The most serious disability discrimination case I have ever seen involved a diabetic plaintiff - a graveyard shift employee pleaded with his employer for a daytime shift to accommodate his diabetic condition, and the employer refused.  As a result, his diabetes worsened to the point where hospitalization was required.  </p>

<p>If you have diabetes and believe you have been discriminated against, the EEOC has an extremely detailed <a href="http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/diabetes.html">fact sheet </a>which outlines a disabled employee's rights under the ADA.  If you have diabetes, expect hostility from your employer, and protect yourself from discrimination by clearly requesting accommodations necessitated by your condition in an email to your EEO officer or Human Resources representative.      <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/diabetes_and_the_americans_wit.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/diabetes_and_the_americans_wit.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:53:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>If an Employee Works Unauthorized Overtime, is the Employer still Obligated to Pay for it?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, New York law requires that employers pay <a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1180137.html">overtime</a>, whether authorized or not.&#160; The overtime rate must be one and one-half times the employee's regular rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in a workweek.&#160; </p>  <p>An employer, however, can discipline an employee if he or she violates the employer's policy of working overtime without the required authorization.&#160; So the bottom line is that you must be paid overtime even if your company did not approve it.&#160;&#160; But, your company can discipline you for doing this.&#160;&#160; </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/if_an_employee_works_unauthori.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/if_an_employee_works_unauthori.html</guid>
         <category>Wage Violations</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:26:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Conan&apos;s Exit Interview: Grace Under Pressure</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Did you catch Steve Carell’s <a href="http://www.tonightshowwithconanobrien.com/video/clips/steve-carell-stops-by-012210/1196076/">hilarious exit interview</a> of fellow (and now former) NBC employee Conan O’Brien on The Tonight Show?  Carell’s deadpan mockery of the exit interview hardly exaggerates the reality.  HR professionals are trained to ask personal questions to probe for morale problems or discrimination which may have motivated an employee’s resignation, often feigning sympathy before coldly asking for keys, badge and your copy card.  </p>

<p>Hold your head high in an exit interview.  Be forward and blunt, and be candid about <a href="http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/employment_discrimination/">discrimination,</a> particularly <a href="http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/sexual_harassment/">sexual harassment</a>.  If you bring a lawsuit, your statements in your exit interview will be exhibit A.  If you decide to play nice and fail to raise discrimination as a reason for leaving, you will lose a tremendous amount of credibility and face an uphill battle in court.      <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/conans_exit_interview_grace_un_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/conans_exit_interview_grace_un_1.html</guid>
         <category>Employment Discrimination</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:36:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Illegal Retaliation in New York City</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>One of the most common issues we hear about from workers is their fear of <a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1195901.html">retaliation</a> if they file a claim against their employer or even make an informal complaint to their employer.&#160; New York City has a very strong anti-retaliation law that protects people.&#160;&#160; Here is a summary of the law.</p>  <p>A company cannot fire, threaten to fire, demote, suspend or take any adverse action against an employee who engages in “protected activity.”&#160;&#160; Some examples of &quot;protected activity&quot; under the Labor Code include:</p>  <ol>   <li>Filing or threatening to file a claim or complaint with the Labor Department. </li>    <li>Taking time off from work to serve on a jury or appear as a witness in court. </li>    <li>Disclosing or discussing your wages. </li>    <li>Using or attempting to use sick leave to attend to the illness of a child, parent, spouse, domestic partner, or child of the domestic partner. </li>    <li>For complaining about safety or health conditions or practices.</li>    <li>Complaining about sex harassment or employment discrimination.&#160; </li> </ol>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/illegal_retaliation_in_new_yor.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/illegal_retaliation_in_new_yor.html</guid>
         <category>Retaliation</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:24:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>How Many Hours per Day or Per Week Can a Person Work? </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Tom works for a company in Brooklyn that is struggling financially.   Tom is being asked to work 15 to 18 hours a day and also on weekends.  He is exhausted and his wife called and wanted to know if there was a limit on how many hours a person can be asked to work.   </p>

<p>She was amazed when I told her that there is no limit.   The law does not provide any limit on how many hours a person can work in a day or a week.   The only real regulation that controls are the <a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1180137.html">overtime laws</a> and these do not limit how long you work, it just provides for extra pay for long hours.   Under the New York and Federal overtime rules, a person must be paid time and half for each hour worked in excess of 40 hours per week.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/how_many_hours_per_day_or_per_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/how_many_hours_per_day_or_per_1.html</guid>
         <category>Wage Violations</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:55:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Are Employees Entitled to Pay for Holiday, Sicktime and Vacations? </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In New York, employees are not entitled to be paid for holidays, sick time or vacations.  Also, there is no rule requiring extra pay for working on a holiday.   Some companies, however, have policies that provide employees with pay for holidays, sick time and even vacation pay.   If your company has such a policy, you then have the right to be paid according to its terms.   But, under the law in New York, you are only entitled to be paid for the time that you actually work and for <a href="http://www.ottingerlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1180137.html">overtime pay</a> for each hour worked in excess of 40 per work week.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/are_employees_entitled_to_pay.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/2010/01/are_employees_entitled_to_pay.html</guid>
         <category>Wage Violations</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:49:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
